UN Security Council Convenes Amid Escalating US-Venezuela Tensions Following Oil Tanker Seizures

Edited by: Tatyana Hurynovich

On Tuesday, December 23, 2025, the United Nations Security Council convened for an emergency session. This meeting was specifically called at the request of the Venezuelan government. The central topic dominating the agenda was the severe deterioration of relations between Caracas and Washington. This crisis was triggered by a string of oil tanker seizures and a subsequent naval blockade announced by the United States. Venezuela swiftly condemned these actions, labeling them as 'international piracy,' marking the peak of ongoing US pressure against the regime led by Nicolás Maduro. Both the Russian Federation and China backed Venezuela's push for a Security Council discussion, insisting that these maritime incidents be addressed within the framework of international law.

The conflict reached a critical flashpoint following key operational events. On December 10, 2025, the US Coast Guard seized the tanker Skipper as part of what the US termed 'Operation Southern Spear.' Just ten days later, on December 20, 2025, the tanker Centuries, which sailed under the flag of Panama, was intercepted. Speaking from Mar-a-Lago, US President Donald Trump explicitly demanded Maduro’s departure, issuing a stern warning regarding the consequences of any resistance. US Secretary of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Noem, linked these seizures directly to efforts aimed at stemming the flow of narcotics into the United States. Furthermore, reports indicate that since early September 2025, US military forces have conducted strikes against smaller vessels, resulting in casualties reportedly exceeding 100 individuals.

The justification provided by the US for its aggressive posture centers on combating drug crime and undermining the Maduro administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio asserted that the regime maintains ties with the 'Cartel of the Suns,' an organization officially designated as a terrorist entity by the US. Conversely, Caracas, through its Foreign Minister Iván Gil, maintains that the seizures constitute an overt act of aggression intended for regime change. In a direct legislative response, Venezuela’s National Assembly initiated new laws that impose prison sentences of up to 20 years for anyone committing 'acts of piracy' against commercial vessels operating with the republic.

Russia, represented by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, issued a pointed caution, suggesting that Washington’s maneuvers risked a 'fatal error' that could jeopardize maritime transport stability throughout the region. China, which stands as the primary purchaser of Venezuelan crude, voiced strong condemnation, characterizing the seizures as a blatant violation of international law and an act of unilateral intimidation. This stance was articulated by PRC Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian. Beijing emphasized Venezuela's inherent right to engage in mutually beneficial commerce, particularly with the PRC, to which much of its oil is shipped, often utilizing the so-called 'shadow fleet.' The US naval campaign, 'Operation Southern Spear,' officially launched on September 1, 2025, involved the significant deployment of naval assets, including the carrier strike group spearheaded by the USS Gerald R. Ford.

The blockade, formally imposed by President Trump on December 17, has already caused a sharp contraction in Venezuelan oil exports, forcing vessels to idle in local waters while awaiting clearance. A third vessel, the sanctioned tanker Bella 1, managed to evade capture on Sunday by successfully evading pursuit. This escalating confrontation over maritime assets and sanctions signifies a worrying pivot from economic coercion toward direct kinetic intervention, generating considerable alarm across the international community. The interception of the Centuries, which expert analysis suggests was not under existing sanctions, signals a hardening of the Trump administration’s policy. For Venezuela and its allies, these actions represent a direct assault on national sovereignty and the established international order.

18 Views

Sources

  • Deutsche Welle

  • CBC News

  • Militarnyi

  • Reuters

  • The Washington Post

  • AFP

Did you find an error or inaccuracy?

We will consider your comments as soon as possible.