Gisele Bündchen Reportedly Marries Joaquim Valente in Florida Ceremony

Edited by: Tatyana Hurynovich

Supermodel Gisele Bündchen, age 45, has reportedly formalized her relationship with jiu-jitsu instructor Joaquim Valente in a private ceremony that took place on December 3, 2025, in Surfside, Florida. This reported event follows a significant personal milestone for the couple earlier in the year, as they welcomed their first biological child together, a son, in February 2025.

Bündchen maintains co-parenting responsibilities for her two older children, Benjamin Rein and Vivian Lake, from her prior marriage to former NFL quarterback Tom Brady, a union that officially concluded with their finalized divorce in October 2022. The intimate nature of the December 2025 wedding ceremony was reportedly underscored by the attendance of Bündchen's elder children, according to sources close to the situation, marking a new structure for the family unit.

Joaquim Valente, a prominent figure in the martial arts community, has been publicly associated with Bündchen since her separation from Brady. Valente and his brothers operate a well-regarded jiu-jitsu academy, which has served as a point of connection for the model. The Valente family has deep roots in the martial art, with their father, Pedro Valente Sr., credited with instrumental work in bringing Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu to the United States.

In a public communication in January 2026, Bündchen conveyed a sense of deep satisfaction with her current life arrangement, which now includes her reported husband and their infant son. The location of the wedding, Surfside, Florida, places the event within the general geographic area where Bündchen has established residences. The reported marriage signifies a formal commitment within the evolving personal landscape for the supermodel, whose career trajectory has remained robust amidst personal transitions.

4 Views

Sources

  • Daily Mail Online

  • People

  • E! Online

  • Reality Tea

  • HOLA!

  • Star Magazine

Did you find an error or inaccuracy?We will consider your comments as soon as possible.