Congressman Burlison’s Claims of a Massive UFO in South Korea and the Legislative Push for Transparency

Missouri Representative Eric Burlison has sparked a significant and controversial dialogue within both political and investigative circles following his recent assertions regarding a massive unidentified flying object. According to the congressman, this craft is of such staggering proportions that it is described as being "too large to be moved," and it is purportedly being housed within a highly restricted, secret facility, with some indications pointing toward a location in South Korea. Burlison has characterized this information as being deeply embedded within classified channels, while also referencing figures like Steven Greer or other individuals who have previously brought similar claims to the public eye.

Serving as a member of the influential House Oversight Committee, Burlison has made it clear that he intends to personally visit such a classified site to verify these extraordinary claims. His awareness of the situation appears to be partly informed by the intense speculation and detailed rumors circulating within online communities, particularly on platforms like Reddit, where users have long discussed the existence of massive, immovable anomalous objects. By bringing these discussions into the halls of Congress, Burlison is attempting to bridge the gap between digital whistleblowing and formal government accountability.

This drive for transparency culminated in a major legislative move on August 29, 2025, when Congressman Burlison introduced the UAP Disclosure Act of 2025. This legislation was proposed as a strategic amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the 2026 fiscal year. The act is designed to prevent the destruction of any government records related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena and mandates their systematic declassification for public consumption within a 25-year period, provided that such releases do not pose a direct threat to national security. This initiative highlights the ongoing tension between legislative efforts to inform the public and the more cautious, standardized approach taken by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), which has been the primary body for UAP data collection since its establishment in July 2022.

In addition to his legislative work, Burlison has been vocal about specific incidents involving unidentified objects, such as the footage recorded on October 30, 2024. This video purportedly shows a United States MQ-9 Reaper drone engaging an unidentified "spherical" object near the coast of Yemen using a Hellfire missile. Burlison has drawn attention to the fact that the object appeared to sustain no damage and continued its flight trajectory after the impact, a detail he believes strongly suggests the object possesses non-conventional or non-human characteristics. This stands in stark contrast to the official stance of AARO, which has previously dismissed similar visual data as "unremarkable" and not requiring further scientific investigation.

The congressman’s persistent advocacy is also reflected in his direct questioning of former Pentagon personnel regarding the existence of clandestine, unacknowledged programs. Working in tandem with other prominent transparency advocates like Representatives Anna Paulina Luna and Tim Burchett, Burlison is pushing for a fundamental shift in how the military and intelligence communities manage UAP information. He has noted that while his personal worldview has not been fundamentally altered by the classified briefings he has attended, he remains a firm believer in the integrity and truthfulness of the witnesses who have come forward. This legislative group is united in its goal to end the era of perceived government obfuscation regarding anomalous aerial phenomena.

While the debate over disclosure continues to unfold, AARO is proceeding with its mission to modernize data management, including the implementation of a new case management system on the secure JWICS network, which is expected to be operational by May 2025. Despite these administrative steps, Burlison’s claims about a colossal object in South Korea remain unverified and are currently categorized as being based on unconfirmed reports and internet-driven narratives. Critics of the proposed disclosure laws, including some officials within the Department of Defense, warn that the mandatory release of such data could expose sensitive military technology, whereas the scientific community continues to emphasize that any serious investigation must be rooted in transparent, peer-reviewed, and verifiable evidence.