Mexico held its first-ever judicial elections on Sunday, marking a significant and controversial step in the nation's efforts to reform its judicial system. Championed by President Claudia Sheinbaum and her predecessor, the move makes Mexico the only country to select judges and magistrates through popular vote. Supporters believe this will combat corruption and inefficiency within the judiciary.
However, critics fear the vote will politicize the judiciary, potentially allowing organized crime to infiltrate the courts. Concerns have also been raised about relaxed qualifications for judicial candidates, which could lead to a decline in the quality and independence of the judiciary.
Voters were tasked with electing numerous federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, as well as local judges and magistrates. Protests took place in Mexico City, highlighting concerns about potential electoral fraud and the consolidation of power. Turnout appeared low, with many voters expressing confusion over the numerous, unfamiliar candidates. The controversial election has sparked debate about judicial independence and the potential for political influence, with some experts suggesting the elections may be easily infiltrated by organized crime.