US Chip Export Rules Tightened: South Korean Giants Samsung and SK Hynix Face New Licensing Demands for China Shipments

Edited by: Dmitry Drozd

On September 1, 2025, the United States Department of Commerce implemented a significant shift in its export control policies, impacting global semiconductor supply chains. Previously granted export authorizations for South Korean technology giants Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were revoked. This decision mandates that both companies now require U.S. licenses for any shipments of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to their facilities in China, effectively ending a period of exemptions.

The immediate market reaction saw SK Hynix shares decline by 4.4%, while Samsung's stock fell by 2.3%. Prior to this policy change, these South Korean firms operated under special provisions, allowing them to import essential chip manufacturing equipment to their Chinese operations without the need for individual U.S. licenses. The revocation means that every equipment shipment to China will now necessitate coordination with U.S. regulatory bodies.

SK Hynix's DRAM memory factory in Wuxi and Samsung's NAND production hub in Xi'an are central to this development. The U.S. move also affected Japanese equipment suppliers, whose stock values saw a downturn following the announcement. China has voiced strong criticism, pledging to safeguard the interests of its domestic companies.

Industry analysts suggest that these U.S. restrictions could widen the technological gap between Chinese-manufactured chips and those produced by South Korean competitors, potentially benefiting companies like Micron. The overarching U.S. objective is to curtail China's access to advanced semiconductor technology, citing national security imperatives. The revocation of the "Validated End-User" (VEU) status, which had facilitated smoother equipment imports, signifies a tightening of the U.S. stance.

While the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) indicates an intention to approve licenses for the continued operation of existing fabs, expansions or technological upgrades within China will not be permitted under the new framework. This strategic adjustment reflects a broader global recalibration where technological advancement and national security interests are increasingly intertwined, prompting industries to continuously adapt and seek resilient pathways forward.

Sources

  • avalanchenoticias.com.br

  • Financial Times

  • Reuters

  • Korea JoongAng Daily

Did you find an error or inaccuracy?

We will consider your comments as soon as possible.